Looking for early users for Required fields feature

Kirill Grebtsov
Kirill Grebtsov Member Posts: 59 VERIFIED MEMBER
10 Comments
edited July 2022 in Sales CRM #1

Hello all,

Me and my team are looking for early users for Required fields feature. More info is to follow in this post, but if you are interested in having more control on what data is required to add deal/org/person, please leave a comment with your email here.

Best regards,

Kirill

Tagged:
«13

Comments

  • Bernd Auer
    Bernd Auer Member Posts: 348 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Up Votes 100 Comments 25 Likes
    edited April 2020 #2

    Would love to test it!

    bernd.auer@pd-experts.com

  • Ric Vezza
    Ric Vezza Member Posts: 3 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Solution Provider
    edited May 2021 #3

    Ric@vezzahub.com 👍🏼

  • Flip Nolen
    Flip Nolen Member Posts: 94 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Comments Name Dropper 5 Likes
    edited April 2020 #4

    felicity@soberinthecountry.org

  • Gary Maguire
    Gary Maguire Member Posts: 2 VERIFIED MEMBER
    edited August 2021 #5

    what level subscription would be needed to have this once it goes live?  Do not want to enable a test that get taken away down the line. 

  • Mike Partington
    Mike Partington Member Posts: 2 VERIFIED MEMBER
    edited May 2021 #6

    mpartington@podfather.com

  • Antonio Specchia | easyCRM
    Antonio Specchia | easyCRM Member Posts: 22 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Third Anniversary 10 Comments Photogenic Integration Partner
    edited May 2021 #7

    Please add easycrm thanks

  • Marcelo Silva
    Marcelo Silva Member Posts: 240 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Comments Photogenic
    edited May 2021 #8

     

    marcelonanuvem@gmail.com 

  • Brandon Ingram
    Brandon Ingram Member Posts: 24 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Third Anniversary 10 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited April 2020 #9

    Would love to be involved. Brandon at ectucson.com

  • Boris Tsibelman
    Boris Tsibelman Member Posts: 832 VERIFIED MEMBER
    1000 Comments Third Anniversary 5 Likes First Answer
    edited April 2020 #10

    interested

    boris@axisconsulting.io

  • Jan Visser_342
    Jan Visser_342 Member Posts: 70 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited November 2020 #11

    Please enable jvisser@leibingerusa.com

  • Emily Naehring
    Emily Naehring Member Posts: 1 VERIFIED MEMBER
    edited May 2021 #12

    Emily@97display.com

     

  • Kendra Davies
    Kendra Davies Member Posts: 4 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Third Anniversary
    edited April 2020 #13

    Interested. Please reach out with next steps. kdavies@marketscan.com

    Thank you. 

     

  • Jordan Wagner_74
    Jordan Wagner_74 Member Posts: 8 VERIFIED MEMBER
    First Comment
    edited April 2020 #14

    @Kirill Grebtsov  I am extremely interested in testing this. jordan.wagner@atmosphere.tv

  • Bruno França
    Bruno França Member Posts: 3 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary Photogenic Solution Provider
    edited April 2020 #15

    Hi Kirill

    bruno@itzconsultoria.com.br

  • Produto_529
    Produto_529 Member Posts: 8 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Third Anniversary 10 Comments Photogenic
    edited April 2020 #16

    Please enable produto@concil.com.br. I would love colaborate!

  • Sam Karim
    Sam Karim Member Posts: 23 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited May 2021 #17

    samk@mypioneerroofing.com

  • Sabrina S
    Sabrina S Member Posts: 8 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited May 2021 #18

    I am in

  • flow.digital
    flow.digital Member Posts: 12 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Third Anniversary Photogenic
    edited February 2022 #19

    Yes please! nathan@flowdigitalinc.com 

  • TwelveFifth Inc
    TwelveFifth Inc Member Posts: 7 VERIFIED MEMBER
    edited May 2021 #20

    hello@webgurudc.com

  • Steve Klein
    Steve Klein Member Posts: 4 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Second Anniversary Photogenic
    edited April 2020 #21

    Count me in - sk@cloudify.biz :-)

     

  • Jøran Nohr_2336
    Jøran Nohr_2336 Member Posts: 29 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited May 2021 #22

    Ill be happy to test!

  • FX PulpMeUp.com
    FX PulpMeUp.com Member Posts: 50 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited May 2021 #23

    fx (at) 4front.tech thanks 

  • Einstein Peralta
    Einstein Peralta Member Posts: 3 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary First Comment Photogenic
    edited November 2021 #24

    Hi. I want to try it and give my comments.

    Important fields without filling your data is one of the headaches in the use of crm

  • flow.digital
    flow.digital Member Posts: 12 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Third Anniversary Photogenic
    edited April 2020 #25

    Yes please! nathan@flowdigitalinc.com 

    @Kirill Grebtsov, what's the ETA on this? Can't wait to test! 

  • Jennie Lau
    Jennie Lau Member Posts: 21 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited April 2020 #26

    Hi there, I'd like to test this feature and also give some feedback. I don't work in the B2B field, I work directly with consumers. I like how Pipedrive allows sorting and reports based on "organization" but in sales, what I really need is to track my highest converting referral sources and business partners, so that I can tweak my business activities based on this. Thank you. 

  • Jason Rainbird
    Jason Rainbird Member Posts: 4 VERIFIED MEMBER
    Second Anniversary Photogenic
    edited February 2022 #27

    Yes please, though I worry that this undermines the principal of Pipedrive of being easy to use hence the extremely high uptake with sales people. If mandatory fields are introduced it might kill this. I'd rather see a nagging feature that constantly prompts for fields to be completed, similar to important deal fields but on organisations and people. As an example, let's say management want the postcode set as a mandatory field and I have a lead but don't know the postcode just yet. I won't be able to capture the lead in Pipedrive and will probably never remember to do it later. 

  • Kirill Grebtsov
    Kirill Grebtsov Member Posts: 59 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited April 2020 #28

    Yes please, though I worry that this undermines the principal of Pipedrive of being easy to use hence the extremely high uptake with sales people. If mandatory fields are introduced it might kill this. I'd rather see a nagging feature that constantly prompts for fields to be completed, similar to important deal fields but on organisations and people. As an example, let's say management want the postcode set as a mandatory field and I have a lead but don't know the postcode just yet. I won't be able to capture the lead in Pipedrive and will probably never remember to do it later. 

    I do believe that it's a powerful tool that can be used for both good and bad, this is why when designing required fields we have thought of salespeople and introduced an option for management to choose in what stages certain fields are required, so that deal flow is not impacted.

    Additionally, you mention leads and this part is covered by our Lead inbox which is built around fast lead capture and qualification

  • Nick de Zoete
    Nick de Zoete Member Posts: 1 VERIFIED MEMBER
    edited May 2021 #29

    nzo@container-xchange.com

  • Jan Visser_342
    Jan Visser_342 Member Posts: 70 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited May 2020 #30

    Yes please, though I worry that this undermines the principal of Pipedrive of being easy to use hence the extremely high uptake with sales people. If mandatory fields are introduced it might kill this. I'd rather see a nagging feature that constantly prompts for fields to be completed, similar to important deal fields but on organisations and people. As an example, let's say management want the postcode set as a mandatory field and I have a lead but don't know the postcode just yet. I won't be able to capture the lead in Pipedrive and will probably never remember to do it later. 

    @Jason Rainbird - respectfully, I don't think that's a problem with having mandatory fields as much as with the way people design their sales process.  Clearly, active dialog needs to happen around "what do we absolutely need to capture and where in the process do we need to capture it".  We've actually engaged our sales reps and brainstormed about what the minimum bar should be.  This really helps in getting it right. 

    The way it works now is elegant - and we shouldn't throw this out. I think most people just ask for the possibility of stronger enforcement than the current "nudge" of important fields. 

  • Jan Visser_342
    Jan Visser_342 Member Posts: 70 VERIFIED MEMBER
    10 Comments
    edited February 2022 #31

    @Mike van der Valk Am I supposed to see something that I don't? Or has this not been enabled in my org yet?

This discussion has been closed.